El Estado regulador. Implicancias para el control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa
El Estado regulador. Implicancias para el control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa
Authors
Carbajales, Mariano
Authors
Date
Datos de publicación:
Díkaion, Vol. 28, N° 1, 69-89, 2019
Keywords
Estado de bienestar - Regulación económica - Discrecionalidad administrativa - Control judicial de la administración pública
Collections
Abstract
El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo replantear los criterios sobre los que se asienta actualmente el control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa. Hoy, las sentencias judiciales limitan al máximo el margen de apreciación o libre elección hacia las autoridades administrativas en situaciones imprevistas. Por ello, en el presente artículo nos proponemos mostrar la necesidad, dado el modelo de Estado de Bienestar actualmente vigente, de un nuevo paradigma en el control judicial de la administración pública que, a un mismo tiempo, recoja, oriente y regule las reglas de la economía en procura de la satisfacción más plena del bien común. Para ello el derecho administrativo, junto con el poder judicial, se constituyen como dos herramientas jurídicas esenciales que, más que confrontación o tensión, como hemos visto hasta hoy, requieren coordinación de una parte y autorrestricción por la otra.
The objective of this paper is to rethink the criteria on which the judicial control of administrative discretion is currently based. Currently, court decisions limit the margin of discretion or free choice towards administrative authorities in unforeseen situations. Therefore, in this article we propose to show the need of a new paradigm in the judicial control of the Public Administration that, at the same time, collect, orient and regulate the rules of the economy in search of the fullest satisfaction of the common good; this, given the model of Welfare State currently in force. To doing so, the Administrative Law, together with the Judicial Power, are constituted as two essential legal tools that, more than confrontation or tension, as we have seen until today, require coordination and self-restriction.
The objective of this paper is to rethink the criteria on which the judicial control of administrative discretion is currently based. Currently, court decisions limit the margin of discretion or free choice towards administrative authorities in unforeseen situations. Therefore, in this article we propose to show the need of a new paradigm in the judicial control of the Public Administration that, at the same time, collect, orient and regulate the rules of the economy in search of the fullest satisfaction of the common good; this, given the model of Welfare State currently in force. To doing so, the Administrative Law, together with the Judicial Power, are constituted as two essential legal tools that, more than confrontation or tension, as we have seen until today, require coordination and self-restriction.