El control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa
El control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa
Authors
Castro, Camila
Authors
Date
2023
Datos de publicación:
Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, Vol.14, Nº 2, 1-19, 2023
Keywords
Control - Discrecionalidad - Administración
Collections
Abstract
Este artículo tiene por objeto determinar como se efectúa el control judicial de los actos administrativos discrecionales, emanados de los órganos de la Administración del Estado. En este sentido es trascendental identificar los límites entre la discrecionalidad y arbitrariedad de un acto administrativo, como también los límites del control judicial; encontrando y revisando dos posturas existentes en el derecho español: la primera de ellas reconoce el control judicial con facultad de anular y sin sustitución; y la segunda reconoce este control con facultades del juez para sustituir el acto discrecional anulado. Para finalmente identificar algunas técnicas de control judicial.
The purpose of this article is to determine how judicial control of discretionary administrative acts, emanating from State Administration bodies, is exercised. In this context, it is of vital importance to identify the limit between discretion and arbitrariness in administrative acts, as well as the limits of judicial control. The article identifies and reviews two existing positions in Spanish law: the first recognizes judicial control as having the power to annul without substitution; the second recognizes this control, and the power of the judge to replace the annulled discretionary act. The article ends by identifying some techniques for judicial control.
The purpose of this article is to determine how judicial control of discretionary administrative acts, emanating from State Administration bodies, is exercised. In this context, it is of vital importance to identify the limit between discretion and arbitrariness in administrative acts, as well as the limits of judicial control. The article identifies and reviews two existing positions in Spanish law: the first recognizes judicial control as having the power to annul without substitution; the second recognizes this control, and the power of the judge to replace the annulled discretionary act. The article ends by identifying some techniques for judicial control.