Nine judges enter into dialogue with nine hypotheses about the proof of facts in criminal cases

dc.contributor.authorColoma Correa, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorCarbonell Bellolio, Flavia
dc.contributor.authorAlfaro M., Christian
dc.contributor.authorAvilés M., Luis
dc.contributor.authorBáez R., Danilo
dc.contributor.authorBugueño J., Claudia
dc.contributor.authorJorquera T., Mariela
dc.contributor.authorOlave A., Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorSoto G. Cristian
dc.contributor.authorRivera A., Virginia
dc.contributor.authorToledo C., José
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-04T17:06:58Z
dc.date.available2012-03-04T17:06:58Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-04
dc.description.abstractThis article formulates nine hypotheses concerning the proof of facts in criminal proceedings, which are analysed by nine judges of Chilean criminal Courts (Tribunal de Juicio Oral y de Garantía). Seven hypotheses aimed at describing different practices that take place in the courts and two of them concern how judges should act in certain hard cases. The matters are grouped in the following categories: a) scopes of the compromise that judges should have in order to operate with true stories as support of their decisions; b) difficulties that arise as consequence of the epistemic weakness of the evidence available in trials and the possible slants in their interpretation; c) requirements of the evaluation of the proof according to the sana crítica; and d) meaning that should have the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. In this way, a dialogue between the system of beliefs of judges and of jurists takes place.es
dc.formatPDFes
dc.identifier.citationIus et Praxis, Vol. 16, Nº2, 3-56, 2010es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10925/848
dc.language.isoenes
dc.sourceIus et Praxises
dc.subjectValoración racional de la pruebaes
dc.subjectEstándar de prueba,es
dc.subjectVerdad procesales
dc.subjectCalidad Epistémica de la pruebaes
dc.titleNine judges enter into dialogue with nine hypotheses about the proof of facts in criminal caseses
dc.title.alternativeNueve jueces entran en diálogo con nueve hipótesis acerca de la prueba de los hechos en el contexto penales
dc.typeArtículo de Revistaes
uct.carreraDerechoes
uct.catalogadorpopes
uct.comunidadCiencias Socialeses
uct.facultadFacultad de Ciencias Jurídicases
uct.indizacionISIes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nine_Coloma.doc
Size:
230.5 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
803 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections