Análisis desde de la Perspectiva de Familia de la Ley 30364 para prevenir la violencia
Análisis desde de la Perspectiva de Familia de la Ley 30364 para prevenir la violencia
Authors
Torres, Analucía
Garcia-Zavala, Gabriela
Arela-Bobadilla, Ronal
Castro, Rodolfo
Cerellino, Lila
Garcia-Zavala, Gabriela
Arela-Bobadilla, Ronal
Castro, Rodolfo
Cerellino, Lila
Profesor Guía
Authors
Date
2023
Datos de publicación:
10.7770/CUHSO-V33N1-ART627
Cultura, Hombre, Sociedad (CUHSO), Vol.33, N°1, 267-299, 2023
Cultura, Hombre, Sociedad (CUHSO), Vol.33, N°1, 267-299, 2023
Tipo de recurso
Artículo de Revista
Keywords
Mujer - Violencia - Agresión - Política pública - Perspectiva de familia
Materia geográfica
Collections
Abstract
La violencia intrafamiliar es reconocida como un importante problema de salud pública, cuya complejidad puede ser abordada desde diferentes perspectivas. La perspectiva de familia es un enfoque que en lugar de considerar al individuo de manera aislada; reconoce la importancia de sus relaciones y responsabilidades familiares. Por ello, la finalidad de este estudio es identificar si la perspectiva en base a la cual se ha promulgado la ley 30364, incorpora la perspectiva de familia. La presente investigación sigue un diseño mixto de tipo explicativo secuencial. Para la parte cuantitativa, se utilizó como instrumento la Guía para el Análisis de la Perspectiva de Familia en las Políticas Públicas versión 1.1 y la muestra estuvo conformada por 9 expertos. Para la parte cualitativa, se utilizó como instrumento una entrevista semiestructurada y se tuvo la participación de 3 expertos. Los principales resultados cuantitativos arrojan que ningún criterio considerado en la guía obtiene un puntaje mayor a la mitad, 50 puntos del máximo posible. Siendo el mayor puntaje de calificación de una media de 44.4 y el menor de 11.1; estos resultados, fueron en su mayoría corro-borados a través del análisis cualitativo de categorías, cuyos principales hallaz-gos se desarrollan en el apartado correspondiente. Los resultados señalan, que la ley evaluada no considera los pilares conceptuales de la perspectiva de familia.
Intrafamily violence is recognized as an important public health problem, which complexity can be approached from different perspectives. The family lens is considered more efficient in the evaluation of a phenomenon because, instead of only considering an isolate person, it recognizes the im-portance of family relationships and responsibilities. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify whether the perspective based on which Law 30364 has been enacted incorporates the family lens. The present research follows a mi-xed design of sequential explanatory type. For the quantitative part, the Guide for the Analysis of the Family Lens in Public Policies version 1.1 was used as an instrument and the sample consisted of nine experts. For the qualitative part, a semi-structured interview was used as an instrument and three experts parti-cipated. The main quantitative results show that no criterion considered in the guide obtained a score higher than 50 points. Being the highest rating score of a mean of 44.4 and the lowest of 11.1; these results, were mostly corroborated through the qualitative analysis of categories, which main findings are deve-loped in the corresponding section. It could be evidenced, after the experts' assessment, that the evaluated law does not consider the family lens despite the contribution it could make to understand this problematic.
Intrafamily violence is recognized as an important public health problem, which complexity can be approached from different perspectives. The family lens is considered more efficient in the evaluation of a phenomenon because, instead of only considering an isolate person, it recognizes the im-portance of family relationships and responsibilities. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify whether the perspective based on which Law 30364 has been enacted incorporates the family lens. The present research follows a mi-xed design of sequential explanatory type. For the quantitative part, the Guide for the Analysis of the Family Lens in Public Policies version 1.1 was used as an instrument and the sample consisted of nine experts. For the qualitative part, a semi-structured interview was used as an instrument and three experts parti-cipated. The main quantitative results show that no criterion considered in the guide obtained a score higher than 50 points. Being the highest rating score of a mean of 44.4 and the lowest of 11.1; these results, were mostly corroborated through the qualitative analysis of categories, which main findings are deve-loped in the corresponding section. It could be evidenced, after the experts' assessment, that the evaluated law does not consider the family lens despite the contribution it could make to understand this problematic.