El Derecho constitucional, el nuevo indio y el Estado: nueva agenda para la investigación
El Derecho constitucional, el nuevo indio y el Estado: nueva agenda para la investigación
Authors
Valer Bellota, Pável H.
Authors
Date
2019-10-01
Datos de publicación:
Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, Vol. 9, N°2, 9-33, 2018
Keywords
Derecho constitucional - Multiculturalismo - Pueblos indígenas - Poscolonialismo
Collections
Abstract
El descubrimiento del indígena fue el mayor hallazgo de las Ciencias Sociales peruanas del siglo xx. Para el campo jurídico, sin embargo, este descubrimiento es reciente y, se podría decir casi ausente. La Antropología jurídica y de los modelos políticos pueden y deben revertir la ausencia del hecho y del
sujeto indígena en las ciencias del Estado, del poder, del Derecho Constitucional. Por ello, es necesario diseñar una nueva agenda de investigación que junte aportes de estas disciplinas. Se debe explicar –desde un punto de vista
interdisciplinario jurídico, sociológico, antropológico cultural, y tomando en cuenta los aportes de la ciencia política– las causas y consecuencias del Derecho Constitucional.
En este artículo se bosqueja dicha agenda para dar respuesta a la pregunta metodológica general de ¿cómo ha sido y es el Derecho Constitucional respecto a la diferencia cultural de los ciudadanos? y, de manera específica intenta responder a interrogantes como: ¿cuáles han sido las bases culturales e ideológicas que han fundamentado su elaboración y desarrollo? ¿a favor de qué
grupo cultural se ha construido el Derecho Político? Asimismo, se plantean las respuestas, a manera de hipótesis, para describir el discurso del Derecho
Constitucional peruano respecto a la multiculturalidad de su sociedad
The discovery of the indigenous citizen was the major finding of the social sciences in Peru in the twentieth century. In the field of legal research, however, this discovery is new and, it might be said, almost absent. The anthropology of legal and political models can and should reverse this absence of the indigenous subject, and indigenous social reality, from the sciences of the State, political power and constitutional law. It is therefore necessary to design a new research agenda to gather contributions from these disciplines. The causes and consequences of constitutional law in Peru must be explained from an interdisciplinary legal, sociological, anthropological, cultural standpoint, taking into account the contributions of political science. This article outlines that agenda in order to answer a general methodological question: How has Peruvian Constitutional law dealt with the cultural differences of its citizens in the past, and how does it do so in the present? It also attempts to answer specific questions like: What has been the cultural and ideological basis that has supported its development? In favor of which cultural group has political law been constructed in this country? And finally it provides hypothetical answers describing the discourse of Peruvian Constitutional law regarding multicultural society
The discovery of the indigenous citizen was the major finding of the social sciences in Peru in the twentieth century. In the field of legal research, however, this discovery is new and, it might be said, almost absent. The anthropology of legal and political models can and should reverse this absence of the indigenous subject, and indigenous social reality, from the sciences of the State, political power and constitutional law. It is therefore necessary to design a new research agenda to gather contributions from these disciplines. The causes and consequences of constitutional law in Peru must be explained from an interdisciplinary legal, sociological, anthropological, cultural standpoint, taking into account the contributions of political science. This article outlines that agenda in order to answer a general methodological question: How has Peruvian Constitutional law dealt with the cultural differences of its citizens in the past, and how does it do so in the present? It also attempts to answer specific questions like: What has been the cultural and ideological basis that has supported its development? In favor of which cultural group has political law been constructed in this country? And finally it provides hypothetical answers describing the discourse of Peruvian Constitutional law regarding multicultural society