Ecosystem services and uses of dune systems of the coast of the Araucanía Region, Chile: A perception study

Simple item page
datacite.alternateIdentifier.citationOcean and Coastal Management, 200, 2021
datacite.alternateIdentifier.doi10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105450
datacite.alternateIdentifier.issn0964-5691
datacite.creatorArévalo-Valenzuela, Pablo
datacite.creatorPeña-Cortés, Fernando Andrés
datacite.creatorPincheira-Ulbrich, Jimmy M.
datacite.date2021
datacite.rightsRegistro bibliográfico
datacite.subjectDune Fields
datacite.subjectEcosystem Services
datacite.subjectIndigenous Communities
datacite.subjectInterviews
datacite.subjectLocal Actors
datacite.subjectBiodiversity
datacite.subjectTourism
datacite.subjectContent Analysis
datacite.subjectEcosystem Services
datacite.subjectGeneral Knowledge
datacite.subjectLocal Government
datacite.subjectMultiple Choice
datacite.subjectNatural Process
datacite.subjectSocial-ecological Systems
datacite.subjectTerritorial Planning
datacite.subjectEcosystems
datacite.subjectBiodiversity
datacite.subjectCommunity Resource Management
datacite.subjectDune
datacite.subjectEcosystem Service
datacite.subjectLocal Government
datacite.subjectPerception
datacite.subjectQuestionnaire Survey
datacite.subjectZoning Policy
datacite.subjectAraucania
datacite.subjectChile
datacite.subjectMartes
datacite.titleEcosystem services and uses of dune systems of the coast of the Araucanía Region, Chile: A perception study
dc.contributor.authorPEÑA CORTES, FERNANDO ANDRES
dc.contributor.authorPINCHEIRA ULBRICH, JIMMY MARCELO
dc.description.abstractCoastal dunes can offer a series of Ecosystem Services (ES), especially to local communities. This study aimed to evaluate these benefits by exploring the perception of the Mapuche communities and representatives of the local government concerning the ES provided by the coastal dune fields of the Araucanía Region of Chile. Binary, multiple-choice, Likert scale and open questions were used to explore the general knowledge of 49 subjects about the ES provided by the dunes. Closed questions were analysed using Fisher's exact test, and tests of goodness of fit chi-square and G, while open questions were analysed by qualitative content analysis. The results showed that (1) cultural services were more important for Mapuche communities, while tourism was more valued for local government, (2) tourism and stock-raising were the most frequent use given to the dunes in the opinion of local government and Mapuche communities respondents, respectively, (3) both groups think that dunes offer habitat for biodiversity, and (4) the regulation of natural processes is one of the most important functions for both groups, although Mapuche communities consider that dune fields would not attenuate the effects of a tsunami. The conclusion is that dune fields offer a series of benefits, which are perceived in different ways by Mapuche communities and representatives of the local government. The lack of recognition of this knowledge is one of the main gaps in Chile's territorial planning instruments since it could make a decisive contribution to the management of social-ecological systems by zoning areas and identifying singular components, especially in Mapuche territories. © 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.description.ia_keywordcommunities, mapuche, local, were, dunes, government, dune
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositoriodigital.uct.cl/handle/10925/2661
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relationinstname: ANID
dc.relationreponame: Repositorio Digital RI2.0
dc.rights.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceOcean and Coastal Management
dc.subject.ia_odsODS 15: Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
dc.subject.ia_oecd1nCiencias Naturales
dc.subject.ia_oecd2nCiencias Biológicas
dc.subject.ia_oecd3nEcología
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.driverhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.openaireinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citationEdition2021
oaire.citationTitleOcean and Coastal Management
oaire.citationVolume200
oaire.fundingReferenceANID FONDECYT 1181954 (Regular)
oaire.licenseConditionCopyright © Elsevier Ltd, 2020
oaire.resourceTypeArtículo
oaire.resourceType.enArticle
relation.isAuthorOfPublication257b5d8d-bad9-41d7-9581-b602a920a1c1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0ea75a21-5860-4e71-9c20-6a9e1d056349
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery257b5d8d-bad9-41d7-9581-b602a920a1c1
uct.catalogadorjvu
uct.comunidadRecursos Naturalesen_US
uct.departamentoDepartamento de Ciencias Ambientales
uct.facultadFacultad de Recursos Naturales
uct.indizacionScience Citation Index Expanded - SCIE
uct.indizacionScopus
uct.indizacionAquatic Sciences & Fisheries Abstracts
uct.indizacionOceanic Abstracts
Files
Collections
Medio Ambiente