Institucionalidad y subjetividad, participación y valoración de lo institucional. Reflexiones a partir de estudio de caso en tribunal de familia
Institucionalidad y subjetividad, participación y valoración de lo institucional. Reflexiones a partir de estudio de caso en tribunal de familia
Authors
Ávalos Figueroa, David
Authors
Date
2014-09-01
Datos de publicación:
Cultura - Hombre - Sociedad CUHSO, Vol 24, N°1, 9-51, 2014
Keywords
Subjetividad - Institucionalidad - Símbólico - Forclusión
Collections
Abstract
Proponer que la institucionalidad ordena la forma de acceder
a lo expresivo simbólico subjetivo. Nos plantea una interrogante práctica
sobre cuál es, en definitiva, la eficacia con que comunican dichas
subjetividades, cómo resuelven sus disputas y se relacionan con la violencia.
Este conocimiento se materializa en un proceso de categorización
inductivo/deductivo, de acuerdo a los lineamientos de la teoría fundada,
lo que permite incorporar reflexiones, conceptos y/o afirmaciones extraídas
de procedencia documental, teórico-epistemológica, y también empírica,
comparadas indistintamente.La investigación se enmarca en un estudio de caso, fundamentalmente
a través de entrevistas a funcionarios en el sistema de protección comunal.
Estas entrevistas contextualizan una reflexión interesada en identificar,
en un contexto específico, modos posibles de ser de lo subjetivo, de lo
institucional. En una relación determinante en y para la incorporación
de lo simbólico, desde su eficacia y su actuar frente a la práctica de la
violencia, de lo institucional.Enriquecer la categorización misma como proceso en torno a lo subjetivo
y lo institucional, y sus posibles relaciones. Comprendidas bajo el concepto
de forclusión, según planteamientos del psicoanálisis lacaniano, como
facilitador de una integración conceptual mayor, parte del proceso de
categorizacion.
Se obtienen a través del estudio categorizaciones para ambos conceptos
y en relación a intentar comprender su vínculo, se propone el concepto de
un Estado forcluyente, suponiendo la capacidad de las instituciones de
instaurar un orden simbólico determinando, la capacidad de regular registros
heterogéneos de la experiencia subjetiva, y de su potencial expresivo.
Tendrá importancia en las reflexiones de este estudio la discusión acerca
de una capacidad exclusiva de las instituciones, de instaurar una subjetividad
y realizar este proceso en condiciones menos óptimas, en donde simplemente
prevalece la evidencia de más violencia en sus múltiples expresiones. O en
cambio consideramos el rol protagónico y emergente que pueden adquirir
para este propósito las identidades populares locales. Su relación con
promover lo simbólico como instancia creadora e integradora efectiva, no
únicamente formal y pedagógica.
Propose that the institutional structure, ordered the way of access to the symbolic expressive subjective. We practice raises the question of which is ultimately the effectiveness with which communicate such subjectivities, such as resolve their disputes and relate to the violence. This knowledge is embodied in a process of categorization inductive/deductive, according to the outline of the grounded theory, which allows you to incorporate thoughts, concepts and/or assertions extracted from provenance documentary, theoretical-epistemological, and empirical also compared interchangeably.The research is framed in a case study, primarily interviews with officials public in the communal system of protection. These interviews contextualizes a reflection interested in identifying a specific context, possible modes of being subjective, the institutional. In a relationship and in determining for the incorporation of the symbolic, since its effectiveness and act in the face of the practice of the institutional.Enrich the categorization same as process around the subjective and the institutional, their possible relationships. Will be covered under the concept of forclusion approaches, according to Lacanian psychoanalysis, as a facilitator for the greater conceptual integration. Are obtained through the study categorizations for both concepts and in relation to try to understand its link, it is proposed the concept of a State forcluyente, assuming the capacity of institutions in establish a specific symbolic order.The ability to regulate heterogeneous records of the experience, and its expressive potential. It will matter in the reflections of this study. The discussion about an exclusive capacity of institutions, establish a subjectivity, and perform this process in conditions less optimal, in which prevails just evidence of more violence in its multiple expressions. Or on the other hand we consider the leading role and emerging that they can be purchased for this purpose, local popular identities. His relationship with promote the symbolic as creative instance and effective integration, not only formal and pedagogical.
Propose that the institutional structure, ordered the way of access to the symbolic expressive subjective. We practice raises the question of which is ultimately the effectiveness with which communicate such subjectivities, such as resolve their disputes and relate to the violence. This knowledge is embodied in a process of categorization inductive/deductive, according to the outline of the grounded theory, which allows you to incorporate thoughts, concepts and/or assertions extracted from provenance documentary, theoretical-epistemological, and empirical also compared interchangeably.The research is framed in a case study, primarily interviews with officials public in the communal system of protection. These interviews contextualizes a reflection interested in identifying a specific context, possible modes of being subjective, the institutional. In a relationship and in determining for the incorporation of the symbolic, since its effectiveness and act in the face of the practice of the institutional.Enrich the categorization same as process around the subjective and the institutional, their possible relationships. Will be covered under the concept of forclusion approaches, according to Lacanian psychoanalysis, as a facilitator for the greater conceptual integration. Are obtained through the study categorizations for both concepts and in relation to try to understand its link, it is proposed the concept of a State forcluyente, assuming the capacity of institutions in establish a specific symbolic order.The ability to regulate heterogeneous records of the experience, and its expressive potential. It will matter in the reflections of this study. The discussion about an exclusive capacity of institutions, establish a subjectivity, and perform this process in conditions less optimal, in which prevails just evidence of more violence in its multiple expressions. Or on the other hand we consider the leading role and emerging that they can be purchased for this purpose, local popular identities. His relationship with promote the symbolic as creative instance and effective integration, not only formal and pedagogical.