Dodged subjects, avoided memories: Anthropological and historiographical biases about landowners in the Chilean land reform

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDiaz-Diego, Jose
dc.contributor.authorOrdenes Delgado, Mathias
dc.date2016
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-30T16:25:28Z
dc.date.available2021-04-30T16:25:28Z
dc.description.abstractThe paper describes and analyzes the anthropological and historiographical slants in the study of the Chilean land reform, especially in order to avoid landowners and their diversity of experiences during that agrarian process from an ideological and methodological point of view. We argue that the necessary commitment of anthropologists and historians with the voice of the most disadvantaged or vulnerable social sectors has not been an innocuous theoretical or practical bet, but it has led to less attention to investigations aimed at understanding the logic and rhetoric of those power-holding groups and dominant culture producers, like elites, contributing to a still partial interpretation of the ethno-territorial relations in Southern Chile in recent decades.
dc.identifier.citationHISTORIA UNISINOS,Vol.20,163-177,2016
dc.identifier.doi10.4013/htu.2016.202.05
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriodigital.uct.cl/handle/10925/2567
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherUNIV DO VALE DO RIO DOS SINOS
dc.sourceHISTORIA UNISINOS
dc.subject.englishAnthropology
dc.subject.englishHistory
dc.subject.englishland reform
dc.subject.englishlandowners
dc.subject.englishChile
dc.titleDodged subjects, avoided memories: Anthropological and historiographical biases about landowners in the Chilean land reform
dc.typeArticle
uct.catalogadorWOS
uct.indizacionAHCI
Files
Collections
MigraciĆ³n Web of Science