Coautoría-responsiva y descripción densa: escritura investigativa en perspectiva analéctica-liberadora
Coautoría-responsiva y descripción densa: escritura investigativa en perspectiva analéctica-liberadora
Authors
Carcamo Landero, Solange
Araya Anabalon, Jorge
Araya Anabalon, Jorge
Authors
Date
Datos de publicación:
Cinta de moebio, Vol. 67, 48-64, 2020
Keywords
Praxis escritural - Coautoría - Descolonización epistémica - Descripción densa - Analéctica
Collections
Abstract
El artículo plantea la posibilidad de una escritura-autoría encarnada en la interpretación de la diversidad
sociocultural, cuyo carácter situacional propicie la descolonización de las prácticas investigativas. Para ello, se analiza la tensión escritural que Clifford Geertz configura entre el “estar-allí” (‘escribiendo en’ el campo) y el “estar-aquí” (en el despacho ‘escribiendo acerca de’). Esta tensión es propuesta como parte de una trama que enlaza el sentido hermenéutico de la descripción densa geertziana con la analéctica liberadora de Enrique Dussel. Mediante este entramado, el “estar-allí” y el “estar-aquí” emergen como espaciotiempo de apertura escritural que, gracias a la palabra ajena, deviene coautoría responsiva.
This paper proposes the possibility of a writing-authorship embodied in the understanding of socio-cultural diversity whose situational character favors the decolonization of research practices. For this purpose, is analyzed the writing stress that Clifford Geertz establishes between “being-there” (‘writing in’ the field), and “being-here” (‘writing about’ in the office). This stress is presented as part of a plot that connects the hermeneutic sense of geertzian dense description with Enrique Dussel's liberating analectic. Through this framework, “being-there” and “being-here” emerge as a space-time of writing opening which, by the word of others, becomes a responsive co-authorship.
This paper proposes the possibility of a writing-authorship embodied in the understanding of socio-cultural diversity whose situational character favors the decolonization of research practices. For this purpose, is analyzed the writing stress that Clifford Geertz establishes between “being-there” (‘writing in’ the field), and “being-here” (‘writing about’ in the office). This stress is presented as part of a plot that connects the hermeneutic sense of geertzian dense description with Enrique Dussel's liberating analectic. Through this framework, “being-there” and “being-here” emerge as a space-time of writing opening which, by the word of others, becomes a responsive co-authorship.