Digital Technologies to Benefit the Professional Exercise of Family Mediators in Chile
Digital Technologies to Benefit the Professional Exercise of Family Mediators in Chile
Authors
Alarcón García, Sofía
Authors
Date
Datos de publicación:
Revista de Derecho Privado, N° 39, 33-60, 2020
Keywords
Mediación familiar - Mediador familiar - Tecnologías digitales
Collections
Abstract
En este estudio analizamos tecnologías digitales que pudieran beneficiar
el ejercicio profesional de los mediadores familiares de Chile. Sostenemos la hipótesis de que existen tecnologías digitales que podrían contribuir a resguardar principios de la mediación, favorecer la comunicación, gestionar las emociones y la búsqueda de acuerdos, en armonía con las leyes 19.968 y 19.628 de Chile. Nuestros
resultados muestran doce tecnologías digitales compatibles con nuestra hipótesis.
Concluimos que estas tecnologías contribuyen al ejercicio profesional de los mediadores, siempre que no afecten su desempeño global y no transgredan derechos
fundamentales o la teoría de la mediación.
In this study, I analyze digital technologies that could benefit the professional practice of family mediators in Chile. I supported the hypothesis that there are digital technologies that could contribute to safeguarding principles of mediation, favoring communication, managing emotions, and seeking agreements, in harmony with Chilean laws 19.968 and 19.628. The results show twelve digital technologies compatible with my hypothesis. I conclude that these technologies contribute to the professional practice of mediators but must not affect their overall performance and do not violate fundamental rights or the theory of mediation.
In this study, I analyze digital technologies that could benefit the professional practice of family mediators in Chile. I supported the hypothesis that there are digital technologies that could contribute to safeguarding principles of mediation, favoring communication, managing emotions, and seeking agreements, in harmony with Chilean laws 19.968 and 19.628. The results show twelve digital technologies compatible with my hypothesis. I conclude that these technologies contribute to the professional practice of mediators but must not affect their overall performance and do not violate fundamental rights or the theory of mediation.