Política cultural y construcción discursiva de identidad regional
Política cultural y construcción discursiva de identidad regional
Authors
Campos Winter, Hugo
Authors
Date
2017-05-25
Datos de publicación:
10.7770/CUHSO-V26N1-ART1012
Keywords
Política cultural - Región de los Ríos - Construccionismo social - Psicología discursiva
Collections
Abstract
Este artículo aborda la relación entre la institucionalidad cultural chilena y la construcción de identidad cultural en la Región de los Ríos. En este contexto, se identificó la problemática de la tensión existente entre la autoconstrucción de la Política Cultural 2011-2016 (en adelante PC) como una política de Estado ajena a las ideologías de los gobiernos de turno y la posición de diversos autores quienes argumentan que la PC estaría informada por una ideología neoliberal con la que promovería ciertas identidades culturales en desmedro de otras. Tomando como caso de estudio la Política Cultural de la Región de los Ríos 2011-2016 (en adelante PCRR) y utilizando como enfoque teórico el construccionismo social y metodológico la psicología discursiva, el objetivo fue analizar la elaboración discursiva de la PCRR e interpretar su función de subjetivación de las subjetividades culturales que constituyen la identidad cultural de la Región de los Ríos. El análisis de los resultados corroboró que la PCRR estaría promoviendo inequitativamente identidades culturales mediante el refuerzo de subjetividades foráneas y la socavación de subjetividades locales. Se concluye que la institucionalidad cultural estaría informada por una ideología neoliberal,
gestionando discursivamente lugares inequitativos de enunciación entre los individuos y grupos investidos con las diversas subjetividades culturales que constituyen las identidades culturales regionales y nacionales
This article discusses the relationship between Chilean cultural institutions and the construction of Rivers Region cultural identity. In this context, it was identified the problem of the tension between the self-construction of the Cultural Policy 2011-2016 (hereinafter PC) as a state policy foreign to the ideologies of the successive governments and the position of various authors who argue that the PC it would be informed by a neoliberal ideology which promote certain cultural identities at the expense of others. Taking as a case study the Cultural Policy of the Rivers Region 2011 - 2016 (hereinafter PCRR) and using as a theoretical approach the social constructionism and methodological discursive psychology, the objective was to analyse the discursive elaboration of PCRR and interpret their function of subjectivation of the many cultural subjectivities that constitute the cultural identity of the Rivers Region. The analysis of the results confirmed that the PCRR would inequitably promoting cultural identities through strengthening foreign subjectivities and undermining local subjectivities. It concludes that the cultural institutions would discursively managing inequivalent sites of enunciation between individuals and groups invested with the diverse cultural subjectivities that constitute the regional and national cultural identities.
This article discusses the relationship between Chilean cultural institutions and the construction of Rivers Region cultural identity. In this context, it was identified the problem of the tension between the self-construction of the Cultural Policy 2011-2016 (hereinafter PC) as a state policy foreign to the ideologies of the successive governments and the position of various authors who argue that the PC it would be informed by a neoliberal ideology which promote certain cultural identities at the expense of others. Taking as a case study the Cultural Policy of the Rivers Region 2011 - 2016 (hereinafter PCRR) and using as a theoretical approach the social constructionism and methodological discursive psychology, the objective was to analyse the discursive elaboration of PCRR and interpret their function of subjectivation of the many cultural subjectivities that constitute the cultural identity of the Rivers Region. The analysis of the results confirmed that the PCRR would inequitably promoting cultural identities through strengthening foreign subjectivities and undermining local subjectivities. It concludes that the cultural institutions would discursively managing inequivalent sites of enunciation between individuals and groups invested with the diverse cultural subjectivities that constitute the regional and national cultural identities.